Log In | Register
Why is The Health Care Act being argued before SCOTUS? This is unbelievable. Working people should be insured just in case. My oldest daughter and son-in-law work jobs that together pay over $100,000 a year. Neither my son-in-law nor my daughter had HealthCare Insurance through their employer's. My daughter's reason was " Mama I feed your grand kids healthy foods just like you did me". She told me, They don't ever get sick. Needless to say, I almost made the Guinness Book of World Records. She almost made Me have a baby! I told her it was better to be safe than sorry. I refuse to let up, so they finally had Hospitalization taken from their payroll checks.
Each person working a job should pay at least the minimum for hospitalization. If both husband and wife have low paying jobs, the two insurances should off-set any hospital expenses.
This guy, Paul Clement, argues that this will not stop at making you purchase insurance. He believes that at anytime the government will require all people with high paying jobs to purchase a car in order to give the economy a boost. This is absurd.
Without early detection, you will have people dying from what would have been treatable diseases. They refuse to see a doctor because, They are afraid of being hound by the hospital for failure to pay their bills. That is why it is imparative each working person have Health Insurance.
The Health Insurance Act provides me with one less worry, because my two college aged children will remain on my Health Insurance until age 27. Thank GOD for that and President Obama.
Then there are people in the market who are searching for a job. Finding a job will be one less headache even if they have an existing medical condition. They are still qualified under the Health Care Act to purchase Health Insurance.
It is worthwhile to have insurance, if nothing more than to get your yearly physical.
